Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jul 12, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated the file executor creation process to accept an optional termination function.
    • Simplified internal logic related to subprocess termination handling.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 12, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes remove conditional logic related to subprocess termination in the FileTaskScheduler constructor, update the create_file_executor function to accept an optional terminate_function parameter, and ensure this parameter is passed to FileTaskScheduler. The import of terminate_subprocess was also removed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
executorlib/task_scheduler/file/task_scheduler.py Removed terminate_subprocess import, deleted conditional assignment for terminate_function, updated create_file_executor signature to accept terminate_function, and modified its call to FileTaskScheduler.

Poem

A hop and a skip, the code is now neat,
No more subprocess checks in this rabbit’s retreat.
With cleaner signatures, the tasks are in line,
Optional terminators—how simply divine!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd45608 and eeb38a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • executorlib/task_scheduler/file/task_scheduler.py (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (18)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: notebooks_integration
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
  • GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
  • GitHub Check: minimal
  • GitHub Check: pip_check
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
executorlib/task_scheduler/file/task_scheduler.py (2)

117-117: LGTM! Parameter passing is correct.

The terminate_function parameter is properly passed through to the FileTaskScheduler constructor, maintaining consistency with the function signature change.


93-93: No breaking changes from adding terminate_function to create_file_executor

All existing calls to create_file_executor use keyword arguments (or no arguments) and are unaffected by the new, default-valued terminate_function parameter:

  • tests/test_cache_fileexecutor_serial.py (calls with no args or only keyword args)
  • executorlib/executor/slurm.py (all parameters passed as named arguments)
  • executorlib/executor/flux.py (all parameters passed as named arguments)

Since the new parameter is optional and callers already use keywords, no updates are required.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.90%. Comparing base (bd45608) to head (eeb38a2).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #717      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.90%   96.90%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        1325     1323       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         1284     1282       -2     
  Misses         41       41              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 12, 2025 16:04
@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2025 16:34
@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 601192e into main Jul 12, 2025
110 of 122 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the remove_default_terminate branch July 12, 2025 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants