Skip to content

Conversation

@botovq
Copy link
Contributor

@botovq botovq commented Aug 18, 2023

Unfortunately, some projects are not prepared to build without ENGINE symbols, so just like BoringSSL we needed to keep some stubs.

Unfortunately, some projects are not prepared to build without
ENGINE symbols, so just like BoringSSL we needed to keep some stubs.
@botovq botovq force-pushed the libressl-noengine branch from b135f38 to 3230622 Compare August 18, 2023 06:53
@alex
Copy link
Member

alex commented Aug 18, 2023

Thanks!

@alex alex merged commit d7eca42 into pyca:main Aug 18, 2023
vishwin pushed a commit to vishwin/py-cryptography that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2023
Unfortunately, some projects are not prepared to build without
ENGINE symbols, so just like BoringSSL we needed to keep some stubs.
alex pushed a commit to alex/cryptography that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
Unfortunately, some projects are not prepared to build without
ENGINE symbols, so just like BoringSSL we needed to keep some stubs.
reaperhulk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
* Backport LibreSSL 3.8.2 support for a 41.0.7 release

* ci fixes

* LibreSSL 3.8.1 and later is OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE (#9456)

Unfortunately, some projects are not prepared to build without
ENGINE symbols, so just like BoringSSL we needed to keep some stubs.

* Don't build dh code on BoringSSL (#9103)

It doesn't support DH via EVP

* Update ci.yml (#9527)

---------

Co-authored-by: Theo Buehler <[email protected]>
@botovq botovq deleted the libressl-noengine branch November 22, 2025 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants