Skip to content

Inconsistent comments between 2 templates of unchecked(). #4519

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions include/pybind11/numpy.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1121,10 +1121,10 @@ class array_t : public array {

/**
* Returns a proxy object that provides const access to the array's data without bounds or
* dimensionality checking. Unlike `unchecked()`, this does not require that the underlying
* array have the `writable` flag. Use with care: the array must not be destroyed or reshaped
* for the duration of the returned object, and the caller must take care not to access invalid
* dimensions or dimension indices.
* dimensionality checking. Unlike `mutable_unchecked()`, this does not require that the
* underlying array have the `writable` flag. Use with care: the array must not be destroyed
* or reshaped for the duration of the returned object, and the caller must take care not to
* access invalid dimensions or dimension indices.
*/
template <ssize_t Dims = -1>
detail::unchecked_reference<T, Dims> unchecked() const & {
Expand Down