remove repeated conditional branch logic #671
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bobbins228
requested changes
Sep 17, 2024
KPostOffice
force-pushed
the
do-be-dry
branch
from
58c9b60 to
e2caf94
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kevin <[email protected]>
KPostOffice
force-pushed
the
do-be-dry
branch
from
e2caf94 to
ee900d9
Compare
Bobbins228
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2024
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Bobbins228 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
openshift-merge-bot
bot
merged commit e1c1b97
into
project-codeflare:main
10 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed that this section of the code was a little repetitive while I was making some other changes. This should be logically equivalent