Deprecate ActorIsolated.

README.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 Reliably testable Swift concurrency.
 
   * [Motivation](#motivation)
-      * [`ActorIsolated` and `LockIsolated`](#actorisolated-and-lockisolated)
+      * [`LockIsolated`](#lockisolated)
       * [Streams](#streams)
       * [Tasks](#tasks)
       * [Serial execution](#serial-execution)
@@ -34,19 +34,16 @@ You can watch all of the episodes [here](https://www.pointfree.co/collections/co
 This library comes with a number of tools that make working with Swift concurrency easier and more
 testable.
 
-  * [`ActorIsolated` and `LockIsolated`](#actorisolated-and-lockisolated)
+  * [`LockIsolated`](#lockisolated)
   * [Streams](#streams)
   * [Tasks](#tasks)
   * [`UncheckedSendable`](#uncheckedsendable)
   * [Serial execution](#serial-execution)
 
-### `ActorIsolated` and `LockIsolated`
+### LockIsolated`
 
-The `ActorIsolated` and `LockIsolated` types help wrap other values in an isolated context.
-`ActorIsolated` wraps the value in an actor so that the only way to access and mutate the value is
-through an async/await interface. `LockIsolated` wraps the value in a class with a lock, which
-allows you to read and write the value with a synchronous interface. You should prefer to use
-`ActorIsolated` when you have access to an asynchronous context.
+The `LockIsolated` type helps wrap other values in an isolated context. It wraps the value in a 
+class with a lock, which allows you to read and write the value with a synchronous interface.
 
 ### Streams
 

Sources/ConcurrencyExtras/ActorIsolated.swift

@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 /// ```
 ///
 /// To synchronously isolate a value, see ``LockIsolated``.
+@available(*, deprecated, message: "Use 'LockIsolated' instead.")
 public final actor ActorIsolated<Value> {
   /// The actor-isolated value.
   public var value: Value

Sources/ConcurrencyExtras/Documentation.docc/ConcurrencyExtras.md

@@ -7,13 +7,10 @@ Useful, testable Swift concurrency.
 This library comes with a number of tools that make working with Swift concurrency easier and more
 testable.
 
-### ActorIsolated and LockIsolated
+### LockIsolated
 
-The ``ActorIsolated`` and ``LockIsolated`` types help wrap other values in an isolated context.
-`ActorIsolated` wraps the value in an actor so that the only way to access and mutate the value is
-through an async/await interface. ``LockIsolated`` wraps the value in a class with a lock, which
-allows you to read and write the value with a synchronous interface. You should prefer to use
-`ActorIsolated` when you have access to an asynchronous context.
+The `LockIsolated` type helps wrap other values in an isolated context. It wraps the value in a 
+class with a lock, which allows you to read and write the value with a synchronous interface.
 
 ### Streams
 
@@ -238,13 +235,12 @@ need to make weaker assertions due to non-determinism, but can still assert on s
 
 ### Data races
 
-- ``ActorIsolated``
 - ``LockIsolated``
 
 ### Serial execution
 
 - <doc:ReliablyTestingAsync>
-- ``withMainSerialExecutor(operation:)-79jpc``
+- ``withMainSerialExecutor(operation:)-5wq73``
 
 ### Preconcurrency
 

Sources/ConcurrencyExtras/Documentation.docc/Deprecations/ActorIsolatedDeprecations.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Deprecations
+
+Review unsupported reducer APIs and their replacements.
+
+## Overview
+
+Avoid using deprecated APIs in your app. Select a method to see the replacement that you should use
+instead.
+
+## Topics
+
+### Case path deprecations
+
+- ``ActorIsolated``

Sources/ConcurrencyExtras/LockIsolated.swift

@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ import Foundation
 
 /// A generic wrapper for isolating a mutable value with a lock.
 ///
-/// To asynchronously isolate a value on an actor, see ``ActorIsolated``. If you trust the
-/// sendability of the underlying value, consider using ``UncheckedSendable``, instead.
+/// If you trust the sendability of the underlying value, consider using ``UncheckedSendable``,
+/// instead.
 @dynamicMemberLookup
 public final class LockIsolated<Value>: @unchecked Sendable {
   private var _value: Value

Sources/ConcurrencyExtras/UncheckedSendable.swift

@@ -10,8 +10,7 @@
 /// > that the type is safe to use from multiple threads, and the compiler cannot help you find
 /// > potential race conditions in your code.
 ///
-/// To synchronously isolate a value with a lock, see ``LockIsolated``. To asynchronously isolated a
-/// value on an actor, see ``ActorIsolated``.
+/// To synchronously isolate a value with a lock, see ``LockIsolated``. 
 #if swift(>=5.10)
   @available(iOS, deprecated: 9999, message: "Use 'nonisolated(unsafe) let', instead.")@available(
     macOS, deprecated: 9999, message: "Use 'nonisolated(unsafe) let', instead."

Tests/ConcurrencyExtrasTests/ActorIsolatedTests.swift

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 import ConcurrencyExtras
 import XCTest
 
+@available(*, deprecated)
 final class ActorIsolatedTests: XCTestCase {
   func testAsyncWithValue() async {
     let numbers = ActorIsolated<Set<Int>>([])

Tests/ConcurrencyExtrasTests/MainSerialExecutorTests.swift

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
       XCTAssertEqual(Array(1...1000), xs.value)
     }
 
+    @available(*, deprecated)
     func testSerializedExecution_WithActor() async {
       let xs = ActorIsolated<[Int]>([])
       await withMainSerialExecutor {