Update reportIssue formatting to avoid console errors

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Core.swift

@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ final class RootCore<Root: Reducer>: Core {
                 if isCompleted.value {
                   reportIssue(
                     """
-                    An action was sent from a completed effect:
+                    An action was sent from a completed effect.
 
                       Action:
                         \(debugCaseOutput(effectAction))

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Dependencies/Dismiss.swift

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ public struct DismissEffect: Sendable {
     else {
       reportIssue(
         """
-        A reducer requested dismissal at "\(fileID):\(line)", but couldn't be dismissed. …
+        A reducer requested dismissal at "\(fileID):\(line)", but couldn't be dismissed.
 
         This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen when a reducer \
         assumes it runs in a presentation context. If a reducer can run at both the root level \

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Documentation.docc/Tutorials/BuildingSyncUps/08-RecordMeeting/ImplementingTimer-04-code-0007.swift

@@ -30,6 +30,6 @@ struct RecordMeetingTests {
     // ❌ The store received 1 unexpected action by the end of this test: …
     //
     //   Unhandled actions:
-    //     • .timerTick
+    //     .timerTick
   }
 }

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Effect.swift

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
               guard let handler else {
                 reportIssue(
                   """
-                  An "Effect.run" returned from "\(fileID):\(line)" threw an unhandled error. …
+                  An "Effect.run" returned from "\(fileID):\(line)" threw an unhandled error.
 
                   \(String(customDumping: error).indent(by: 4))
 
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@
       name: String?,
       priority: TaskPriority? = nil,
       operation: @escaping @Sendable () async throws -> Success
     ) where Failure == Error {
       self.init(priority: priority, operation: operation)
     }
   }

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Effects/TaskResult.swift

@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ extension TaskResult: Equatable where Success: Equatable {
               let lhsTypeName = typeName(lhsType)
               reportIssue(
                 """
-                "\(lhsTypeName)" is not equatable. …
+                "\(lhsTypeName)" is not equatable.
 
                 To test two values of this type, it must conform to the "Equatable" protocol. For \
                 example:
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ extension TaskResult: Hashable where Success: Hashable {
             let errorType = typeName(type(of: error))
             reportIssue(
               """
-              "\(errorType)" is not hashable. …
+              "\(errorType)" is not hashable.
 
               To hash a value of this type, it must conform to the "Hashable" protocol. For example:
 

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Observation/Binding+Observation.swift

@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ extension BindingAction {
         }
         reportIssue(
           """
-          A binding action sent from a store was not handled. …
+          A binding action sent from a store was not handled.
 
             Action:
               \(typeName(Action.self)).binding(.set(_, \(valueDump)))

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Observation/NavigationStack+Observation.swift

@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ public struct _NavigationLinkStoreContent<State, Label: View>: View {
               """
           reportIssue(
             """
-            A navigation link at "\(fileID):\(line)" is unpresentable. …
+            A navigation link at "\(fileID):\(line)" is not presentable.
 
               NavigationStack state element type:
                 \(elementType)

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Observation/Store+Observation.swift

@@ -500,16 +500,16 @@ extension Store where State: ObservableState {
 
 func uncachedStoreWarning<State, Action>(_ store: Store<State, Action>) -> String {
   """
-  Scoping from uncached \(store) is not compatible with observation.
+  Scoping from uncached '\(store)' is not compatible with observation.
 
   This can happen for one of two reasons:
 
-  • A parent view scopes on a store using transform functions, which has been \
+  1. A parent view scopes on a store using transform functions, which has been \
   deprecated, instead of with key paths and case paths. Read the migration guide for 1.5 \
   to update these scopes: \
   https://swiftpackageindex.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/migratingto1.5
 
-  • A parent feature is using deprecated navigation APIs, such as 'IfLetStore', \
+  2. A parent feature is using deprecated navigation APIs, such as 'IfLetStore', \
   'SwitchStore', 'ForEachStore', or any navigation view modifiers taking stores instead of \
   bindings. Read the migration guide for 1.7 to update those APIs: \
   https://swiftpackageindex.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/migratingto1.7

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Reducer/Reducers/ForEachReducer.swift

@@ -281,22 +281,22 @@ public struct _ForEachReducer<
     if state[keyPath: self.toElementsState][id: id] == nil {
       reportIssue(
         """
-        A "forEach" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received an action for a missing element. …
+        A "forEach" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received an action for a missing element.
 
           Action:
             \(debugCaseOutput(action))
 
         This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen for a few reasons:
 
-        • A parent reducer removed an element with this ID before this reducer ran. This reducer \
+        A parent reducer removed an element with this ID before this reducer ran. This reducer \
         must run before any other reducer removes an element, which ensures that element reducers \
         can handle their actions while their state is still available.
 
-        • An in-flight effect emitted this action when state contained no element at this ID. \
+        An in-flight effect emitted this action when state contained no element at this ID. \
         While it may be perfectly reasonable to ignore this action, consider canceling the \
         associated effect before an element is removed, especially if it is a long-living effect.
 
-        • This action was sent to the store while its state contained no element at this ID. To \
+        This action was sent to the store while its state contained no element at this ID. To \
         fix this make sure that actions for this reducer can only be sent from a store when \
         its state contains an element at this id. In SwiftUI applications, use "ForEachStore".
         """,

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Reducer/Reducers/IfCaseLetReducer.swift

@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ public struct _IfCaseLetReducer<Parent: Reducer, Child: Reducer>: Reducer {
       reportIssue(
         """
         An "ifCaseLet" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received a child action when child state \
-        was set to a different case. …
+        was set to a different case.
 
           Action:
         \(String(customDumping: action).indent(by: 4))
@@ -224,16 +224,16 @@ public struct _IfCaseLetReducer<Parent: Reducer, Child: Reducer>: Reducer {
 
         This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen for a few reasons:
 
-        • A parent reducer set "\(typeName(Parent.State.self))" to a different case before this \
+        A parent reducer set "\(typeName(Parent.State.self))" to a different case before this \
         reducer ran. This reducer must run before any other reducer sets child state to a \
         different case. This ensures that child reducers can handle their actions while their \
         state is still available.
 
-        • An in-flight effect emitted this action when child state was unavailable. While it may \
+        An in-flight effect emitted this action when child state was unavailable. While it may \
         be perfectly reasonable to ignore this action, consider canceling the associated effect \
         before child state changes to another case, especially if it is a long-living effect.
 
-        • This action was sent to the store while state was another case. Make sure that actions \
+        This action was sent to the store while state was another case. Make sure that actions \
         for this reducer can only be sent from a store when state is set to the appropriate \
         case. In SwiftUI applications, use "SwitchStore".
         """,

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Reducer/Reducers/IfLetReducer.swift

@@ -287,22 +287,22 @@ public struct _IfLetReducer<Parent: Reducer, Child: Reducer>: Reducer {
       reportIssue(
         """
         An "ifLet" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received a child action when child state was \
-        "nil". …
+        "nil".
 
           Action:
         \(String(customDumping: action).indent(by: 4))
 
         This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen for a few reasons:
 
-        • A parent reducer set child state to "nil" before this reducer ran. This reducer must run \
+        A parent reducer set child state to "nil" before this reducer ran. This reducer must run \
         before any other reducer sets child state to "nil". This ensures that child reducers can \
         handle their actions while their state is still available.
 
-        • An in-flight effect emitted this action when child state was "nil". While it may be \
+        An in-flight effect emitted this action when child state was "nil". While it may be \
         perfectly reasonable to ignore this action, consider canceling the associated effect \
         before child state becomes "nil", especially if it is a long-living effect.
 
-        • This action was sent to the store while state was "nil". Make sure that actions for this \
+        This action was sent to the store while state was "nil". Make sure that actions for this \
         reducer can only be sent from a store when state is non-"nil". In SwiftUI \
         applications, use "IfLetStore".
         """,

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Reducer/Reducers/PresentationReducer.swift

@@ -632,19 +632,19 @@ public struct _PresentationReducer<Base: Reducer, Destination: Reducer>: Reducer
       reportIssue(
         """
         An "ifLet" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received a presentation action when \
-        destination state was absent. …
+        destination state was absent.
 
           Action:
             \(debugCaseOutput(action))
 
         This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen for a few \
         reasons:
 
-        • A parent reducer set destination state to "nil" before this reducer ran. This reducer \
+        A parent reducer set destination state to "nil" before this reducer ran. This reducer \
         must run before any other reducer sets destination state to "nil". This ensures that \
         destination reducers can handle their actions while their state is still present.
 
-        • This action was sent to the store while destination state was "nil". Make sure that \
+        This action was sent to the store while destination state was "nil". Make sure that \
         actions for this reducer can only be sent from a store when state is present, or \
         from effects that start from this reducer.
         """,

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Reducer/Reducers/Scope.swift

@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ public struct Scope<ParentState, ParentAction, Child: Reducer>: Reducer {
         reportIssue(
           """
           A "Scope" at "\(fileID):\(line)" received a child action when child state was set to a \
-          different case. …
+          different case.
 
             Action:
               \(debugCaseOutput(action))
@@ -357,18 +357,18 @@ public struct Scope<ParentState, ParentAction, Child: Reducer>: Reducer {
           This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen for a few \
           reasons:
 
-          • A parent reducer set "\(typeName(ParentState.self))" to a different case before the \
+          A parent reducer set "\(typeName(ParentState.self))" to a different case before the \
           scoped reducer ran. Child reducers must run before any parent reducer sets child state \
           to a different case. This ensures that child reducers can handle their actions while \
           their state is still available. Consider using "Reducer.ifCaseLet" to embed this \
           child reducer in the parent reducer that change its state to ensure the child reducer \
           runs first.
 
-          • An in-flight effect emitted this action when child state was unavailable. While it may \
+          An in-flight effect emitted this action when child state was unavailable. While it may \
           be perfectly reasonable to ignore this action, consider canceling the associated effect \
           before child state changes to another case, especially if it is a long-living effect.
 
-          • This action was sent to the store while state was another case. Make sure that actions \
+          This action was sent to the store while state was another case. Make sure that actions \
           for this reducer can only be sent from a store when state is set to the appropriate \
           case. In SwiftUI applications, use "SwitchStore".
           """,

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/Reducer/Reducers/StackReducer.swift

@@ -526,22 +526,22 @@ public struct _StackReducer<Base: Reducer, Destination: Reducer>: Reducer {
       } else {
         reportIssue(
           """
-          A "forEach" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received an action for a missing element. …
+          A "forEach" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received an action for a missing element.
 
             Action:
               \(debugCaseOutput(destinationAction))
 
           This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen for a few reasons:
 
-          • A parent reducer removed an element with this ID before this reducer ran. This reducer \
+          A parent reducer removed an element with this ID before this reducer ran. This reducer \
           must run before any other reducer removes an element, which ensures that element \
           reducers can handle their actions while their state is still available.
 
-          • An in-flight effect emitted this action when state contained no element at this ID. \
+          An in-flight effect emitted this action when state contained no element at this ID. \
           While it may be perfectly reasonable to ignore this action, consider canceling the \
           associated effect before an element is removed, especially if it is a long-living effect.
 
-          • This action was sent to the store while its state contained no element at this ID. To \
+          This action was sent to the store while its state contained no element at this ID. To \
           fix this make sure that actions for this reducer can only be sent from a store when \
           its state contains an element at this id. In SwiftUI applications, use \
           "NavigationStack.init(path:)" with a binding to a store.
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ public struct _StackReducer<Base: Reducer, Destination: Reducer>: Reducer {
         reportIssue(
           """
           A "forEach" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received a "popFrom" action for a missing \
-          element. …
+          element.
 
             ID:
               \(id)
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ public struct _StackReducer<Base: Reducer, Destination: Reducer>: Reducer {
         reportIssue(
           """
           A "forEach" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received a "push" action for an element it \
-          already contains. …
+          already contains.
 
             ID:
               \(id)
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ public struct _StackReducer<Base: Reducer, Destination: Reducer>: Reducer {
           reportIssue(
             """
             A "forEach" at "\(self.fileID):\(self.line)" received a "push" action with an \
-            unexpected generational ID. …
+            unexpected generational ID.
 
               Received ID:
                 \(id)

Sources/ComposableArchitecture/SwiftUI/Binding.swift

@@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ extension WithViewStore where ViewState: Equatable, Content: View {
           """
           A binding action sent from a store \
           \(context == .bindingState ? "for binding state defined " : "")at \
-          "\(fileID):\(line)" was not handled. …
+          "\(fileID):\(line)" was not handled.
 
             Action:
               \(typeName(bindableActionType)).binding(.set(_, \(valueDump)))