Isosurface integration #3311
Closed
Isosurface integration #3311
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@etpinard Please wait on this as the other approach seems to provide better results. Here is a quick draft image: |
|
Following is a better illustration of using the other module in plotly.js combination with mesh3d setup (i.e. not using this branch!): |
|
Now on #3340 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is the continuation of #2752 which uses the latest master changes as well as those in
plotly-integrationbranch of gl-isosurface3d repository.@etpinard
@alexcjohnson
@bpostlethwaite