Skip to content

Conversation

xpander-ai-coding-agent
Copy link

@xpander-ai-coding-agent xpander-ai-coding-agent commented Aug 6, 2025

Summary

This PR solves issue #168 by converting the ai_news_generator project from a simple CrewAI crew to use CrewAI Flows, creating a proper agentic workflow.

Key Changes

Replaced simple Crew with CrewAI Flow architecture

  • Implemented NewsGeneratorFlow class extending Flow
  • Added proper phase separation with decorators

Phase 1: Research Phase (@start)

  • Senior Research Analyst agent
  • Comprehensive topic research using SerperDev tool
  • Structured research brief output with citations

Phase 2: Writing Phase (@listen)

  • Content Writer agent
  • Transforms research into engaging blog post
  • Listens for research phase completion before starting

Updated Documentation

  • Added architecture section explaining the two-phase workflow
  • Updated dependencies and installation instructions
  • Improved README formatting and title capitalization

Technical Implementation

  • Used @start() decorator to mark the initial research phase
  • Used @listen(research_phase) for proper task sequencing
  • Maintained existing LLM model (Cohere Command-R) and tools
  • Preserved all original functionality while improving workflow structure

Benefits

  • Proper task sequencing: Writing phase only starts after research completes
  • Better state management: Flow handles data passing between phases
  • Improved maintainability: Clear separation of concerns
  • Event-driven architecture: More robust workflow execution

Test Plan

  • Import test passes without syntax errors
  • CrewAI Flow decorators work correctly
  • All dependencies install successfully
  • Application structure maintains backward compatibility

Closes #168

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated the README with a clearer project description, installation instructions, and a new architecture section explaining the two-phase agentic workflow.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined content generation into a structured two-phase workflow, improving modularity and clarity without changing the user interface.

- Replaced simple Crew implementation with CrewAI Flow architecture
- Added @start decorator for research phase (Senior Research Analyst)
- Added @listen decorator for writing phase (Content Writer)
- Created structured two-phase workflow ensuring proper task sequencing
- Updated README with architecture documentation and improved formatting
- Fixed title capitalization in README

Resolves issue patchy631#168: use crewai flow instead of simple crew

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes refactor the AI news generator application to use CrewAI Flows, transitioning from a simple sequential agent setup to a structured, two-phase agentic workflow. The README is updated to reflect these architectural changes, and the application logic is encapsulated within a new flow class, enhancing modularity and clarity.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
README Update
ai_news_generator/README.md
Capitalized title, expanded project description, updated dependencies, and added a detailed architecture section describing the two-phase agentic workflow.
CrewAI Flow Refactor
ai_news_generator/app.py
Refactored content generation into a NewsGeneratorFlow class with @start() and @listen() phases for research and writing, replacing the previous single-function approach. Streamlit UI remains unchanged but now calls the new flow-based logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Streamlit UI
    participant NewsGeneratorFlow
    participant Senior Research Analyst
    participant Content Writer

    User->>Streamlit UI: Enter topic & submit
    Streamlit UI->>NewsGeneratorFlow: generate_content(topic)
    NewsGeneratorFlow->>Senior Research Analyst: research_phase(topic)
    Senior Research Analyst-->>NewsGeneratorFlow: research_output
    NewsGeneratorFlow->>Content Writer: writing_phase(research_output)
    Content Writer-->>NewsGeneratorFlow: final_blog_post
    NewsGeneratorFlow-->>Streamlit UI: Return final_blog_post
    Streamlit UI-->>User: Display blog post
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor to use CrewAI Flows for agentic workflow (#168)
Create a two-phase flow: research then writing (#168)
Update documentation to describe CrewAI Flows and new workflow (#168)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes found.

Possibly related PRs

  • AI News generator app #10: Introduced the initial app implementation with the standalone generate_content function and agent/task setup, which is directly refactored in this PR.

Poem

In the warren where code and ideas flow,
A rabbit refactored, making workflows grow.
Agents now dance in CrewAI’s embrace,
Research, then writing, each in their place.
With phases so clear and docs shining bright,
This agentic leap is a coder’s delight!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67aa2f3 and fe048c0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • ai_news_generator/__pycache__/app.cpython-311.pyc is excluded by !**/*.pyc
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ai_news_generator/README.md (2 hunks)
  • ai_news_generator/app.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
ai_news_generator/README.md (3)

2-4: Documentation updates align well with the implementation

The title capitalization and description update accurately reflect the new CrewAI Flows architecture.


16-16: Dependencies list is complete

All required packages for the CrewAI Flows implementation are properly included.


19-36: Architecture documentation is clear and comprehensive

The two-phase workflow description effectively explains the sequential nature of the research and writing phases with proper decorator annotations.

ai_news_generator/app.py (6)

5-5: Correct imports for CrewAI Flows

The Flow class and decorators are properly imported.


49-58: Well-structured Flow class initialization

The NewsGeneratorFlow class properly extends Flow and initializes all necessary components including the LLM and search tool.


59-112: Research phase implementation is comprehensive

The @start() decorator correctly marks this as the initial phase. The Senior Research Analyst agent configuration and task definition are thorough and well-structured.


114-168: Writing phase correctly implements event-driven pattern

The @listen(research_phase) decorator properly establishes the dependency between phases, and the research output is effectively integrated into the writing task.


170-173: Clean wrapper function maintains backward compatibility

The generate_content function effectively wraps the new Flow implementation, preserving the existing interface for the Streamlit UI.


186-186: Verify Flow.kickoff() returns a .raw attribute

Please confirm that NewsGeneratorFlow.kickoff() returns an object exposing a raw property before passing result.raw into st.download_button. If the kickoff result doesn’t include .raw, adjust the flow or unwrap its return value accordingly.

• ai_news_generator/app.py: lines 172–186 (in generate_content and the download button)

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use crewai flow instead of simple crew

1 participant