LLM related actions

[parmesant]

Fixes #XXXX.

Description

---

This PR has:

• been tested to ensure log ingestion and log query works.
• added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious for an unfamiliar reader.
• added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Expanded role management capabilities with support for LLM operations. Users can now add, delete, retrieve, and list LLM resources, enhancing access control and administrative flexibility.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This change introduces four new LLM-related actions into the role-based access control system. The Action enum in the RBAC module now includes AddLLM, DeleteLLM, GetLLM, and ListLLM. The RoleBuilder implementation is updated with new cases to recognize these actions when constructing permissions. Additionally, the new actions are incorporated into the default privilege definitions in the model module, extending the system's capability to manage LLM resources through role assignments.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
src/rbac/role.rs	Added new enum variants (AddLLM, DeleteLLM, GetLLM, ListLLM); updated RoleBuilder match logic to process the new actions
.../model/module	Modified default privilege definitions to reference the new LLM actions

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant RB as RoleBuilder
    participant APP as Permission Engine

    U->>RB: Request permission build (Action)
    RB->>RB: Match on Action (e.g., AddLLM, DeleteLLM, GetLLM, ListLLM)
    RB->>APP: Update permission with new LLM action
    APP-->>RB: Confirm assignment
    RB-->>U: Return built permission

Loading

Poem

I’m a coding bunny, hopping with glee,
New LLM actions now set our code free.
RoleBuilder hops and matches with flair,
Default privileges dance everywhere.
Leaping high in the realm of RBAC,
I celebrate changes with a joyful hack! 🐇

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0c7df9 and b09c0ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/rbac/role.rs (6 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)

• GitHub Check: Build Default x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
• GitHub Check: Build Default aarch64-apple-darwin
• GitHub Check: Build Default x86_64-apple-darwin
• GitHub Check: Build Kafka aarch64-apple-darwin
• GitHub Check: Build Default x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
• GitHub Check: Build Default aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
• GitHub Check: Build Kafka x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
• GitHub Check: coverage
• GitHub Check: Quest Smoke and Load Tests for Distributed deployments
• GitHub Check: Quest Smoke and Load Tests for Standalone deployments

🔇 Additional comments (4)

src/rbac/role.rs (4)

51-54: LGTM: LLM action additions follow established patterns

The four new LLM-related actions (AddLLM, DeleteLLM, GetLLM, ListLLM) follow the same naming conventions as existing actions and are appropriately added after the existing QueryLLM action.

---

122-125: LGTM: Proper integration in permission building logic

The new LLM actions are correctly integrated into the permission-building logic, matching how other similar actions are handled in the pattern matching.

---

343-343: LGTM: No changes to file structure

The closing brace of the module is preserved correctly.

---

245-246:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify the LLM permissions allocation strategy

I notice that only GetLLM and ListLLM are added to the editor, writer, and reader roles, while AddLLM and DeleteLLM seem to be restricted to the admin role (via Action::All). This might be intentional, but please verify this is the desired permission model.

Also applies to: 289-290, 313-314

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any other roles in the codebase are granted AddLLM or DeleteLLM permissions
echo "Searching for potential uses of AddLLM or DeleteLLM actions in roles or permissions..."
rg -A 3 -B 3 "AddLLM|DeleteLLM" --type rust --glob "!src/rbac/role.rs"

Length of output: 255

---

LLM Permission Model Verification

The current implementation assigns only Action::GetLLM and Action::ListLLM to the editor, writer, and reader roles, with AddLLM and DeleteLLM implicitly reserved for the admin role via Action::All. A search outside src/rbac/role.rs for AddLLM and DeleteLLM did not return any instances of these actions being explicitly granted to other roles. While this suggests that the design intentionally restricts these actions to admins, it would be prudent to verify this allocation manually.

• Review Locations:
  • src/rbac/role.rs (Lines 245–246, 289–290, 313–314)

Please confirm that restricting AddLLM and DeleteLLM to admin (via Action::All) is the intended permission model.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[nikhilsinhaparseable]

good to merge