Skip to content

Conversation

@lithomas1
Copy link
Contributor

The replacement for generated_jit is numba.extending.overload.

That shouldn't be necessary tho IMO.
Since the user function is always part of another jitted numba function, we can just mark the function as jitable and have it inherit the nopython, nogil, etc. of the outer function.

@lithomas1 lithomas1 added Compat pandas objects compatability with Numpy or Python functions Clean numba numba-accelerated operations labels May 30, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.1 milestone May 30, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit a1f050a into pandas-dev:main May 30, 2023
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @lithomas1

topper-123 pushed a commit to topper-123/pandas that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2023
CLN/DEPR: Remove deprecated numba functions
Daquisu pushed a commit to Daquisu/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2023
CLN/DEPR: Remove deprecated numba functions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Clean Compat pandas objects compatability with Numpy or Python functions numba numba-accelerated operations

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ENH: Replace Numba decorator

2 participants