Skip to content

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Apr 3, 2013

#3251

Have to consider corner cases before merging, rebased on top of #3252

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Sep 22, 2013

@y-p this worth working on in 0.14?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 12, 2013

Sorry, missed this mention. No strong feelings either way, having pandas objects populated with
non-native datatypes is a fringe use-case so, whatever.

as stated in #3251, pprint_dict didn't enfrorce a limit on nested sequences, which can
make the terminal choke on nasty datasets. But again it's not that interesting in practice.

If someone wants to pick this up for 0.14 - great, if not can close next time you go through stale issues.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Dec 22, 2013

meh. Don't think we should try hard to support arbitrary objects inside dataframes.

@ghost ghost closed this Dec 22, 2013
@ghost ghost deleted the GH3251 branch January 26, 2014 21:32
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant