Skip to content

Conversation

WillAyd
Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd commented Jul 16, 2019

@heckeop

@gfyoung I know you asked for a FutureWarning to be raised but I didn't want to mess around with the validation_function in place here so just did a simple revert for sake of time / effort

@WillAyd WillAyd added the IO Data IO issues that don't fit into a more specific label label Jul 16, 2019
@gfyoung
Copy link
Member

gfyoung commented Jul 17, 2019

@WillAyd : I think it's fine to revert in this PR, but I would investigate adding a warning in a follow-up.

@jreback jreback added this to the 0.25.0 milestone Jul 17, 2019
@jreback jreback merged commit 8ffdf7a into pandas-dev:master Jul 17, 2019
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 17, 2019

thanks @WillAyd

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 17, 2019

may need to reopen the original issue?

@WillAyd WillAyd deleted the revert-25623 branch January 16, 2020 00:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
IO Data IO issues that don't fit into a more specific label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

read_excel in version 0.25.0rc0 treats empty columns differently
3 participants