docs: add initial swedish translation for concise guide to evaluating oss

[janderssonse]

This adds an initial Swedish translation of the concise guide to evaluating OSS software, as discussed in this issue: #464 .

It has been proofread by translation friend /thanks!/ https://github.com/haaninjo who, has a long history of translating Swedish free and open source software, in particular in the GNOME/Ubuntu/GNU-systems. Note: We are both part of a community of translators (for example, see haaninjo as coordinator of Gnome SV here https://l10n.gnome.org/teams/sv/, me as Ubuntu translation owner here https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-l10n-sv, and both in the more fsf related translations here https://translationproject.org/team/sv.html so this should be some assurance for you that we have quite a good knowledge of how terms and phrases are commonly translated to Swedish.

There were several proposals for structure regarding translations, and as a suggestion I added this under the docs/LANGCODE/TRANSLATION-structure. However, as I write this, I see that it maybe should have been added as docs/docs/LANGCODE/TRANSLATION- as to mirror the whole structure. Let me know your preferred structure and I'll adjust:)

[david-a-wheeler]

I can't comment on the Swedish, but I'm glad to see it!

[david-a-wheeler]

Would a Swedish speaker please confirm this is reasonable? I'm not exactly qualified to review Swedish :-).

[janderssonse]

@

Would a Swedish speaker please confirm this is reasonable? I'm not exactly qualified to review Swedish :-).

I think the translation is in a fine shape, @haaninjo reviewed it, he is also an experienced translator. We applied for translation membership here #878

[gkunz]

I cannot review the actual content, but that's why we have a translation team.

A quick check of an assisted translation verifies that the content is in-line with the original.

[david-a-wheeler]

Let's merge once @balteravishay has had a chance to review it.

[balteravishay]

thanks for your contribution @janderssonse . we have some suggestions from the best practices WG members. looking forward to seeing this through!

[janderssonse]

thanks for your contribution @janderssonse . we have some suggestions from the best practices WG members. looking forward to seeing this through!

Yes, thanks, I will attend to it the coming days, it has been in my backlog for a while but quite far down, will prio it a bit.

[janderssonse]

Thanks @thomasnyman for the suggestions, most of those were applied. @balteravishay I think we are ready now, sorry for the delay.

[haaninjo]

Ögnade igenom igen, såg två småsaker.

[janderssonse]

Handled reviews, credits given to reviewers, rebased, Ready to rumble!:)

[gkunz]

Thank you @janderssonse for the updates! @balteravishay, @david-a-wheeler, @thomasnyman if you manage, please review (to the best of your Swedish language skills), so that we can get this merged. Let's aim for early next week.