Skip to content

Conversation

@dastergon
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the change:
This PR renames most of the Golang occurrences to Go. The only exception are the proposals, which, are historical archives, so, I believe that there's no need for a change.

Motivation for the change:
The main motivation is to keep consistency with the naming across the project. Some sections mention Go and others Golang. Also, according to the official website, Go is the proper name to use.

Checklist

@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 7, 2021 18:11 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 7, 2021 18:11 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 7, 2021 18:11 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 7, 2021 18:11 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 7, 2021 18:11 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 7, 2021 18:11 Inactive
@jmrodri jmrodri requested review from jmrodri and marc-obrien and removed request for fabianvf and jmccormick2001 March 8, 2021 20:19
Copy link
Member

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dastergon thanks! You can also update website/content/en/docs/building-operators/golang/ to website/content/en/docs/building-operators/go/ if you'd like.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 9, 2021
@dastergon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@estroz That change might break URLs that's why I didn't include it in the changes. If you believe that's OK, I can send an extra commit updating the URL.

@estroz
Copy link
Member

estroz commented Mar 10, 2021

@dastergon fair enough, that can be done later. Can you add a DCO to your commit? Then I'll approve and merge.

Signed-off-by: Pavlos Ratis <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 10, 2021
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 10, 2021 19:57 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 10, 2021 19:57 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 10, 2021 19:57 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 10, 2021 19:57 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 10, 2021 19:57 Inactive
@dastergon dastergon temporarily deployed to deploy March 10, 2021 19:57 Inactive
@dastergon
Copy link
Contributor Author

dastergon commented Mar 10, 2021

@estroz added a DCO to the commit. I hope it's fine now.

@estroz
Copy link
Member

estroz commented Mar 10, 2021

/retest

@estroz estroz merged commit 025f0dd into operator-framework:master Mar 10, 2021
@dastergon dastergon deleted the rm-golang-go branch March 10, 2021 21:58
reinvantveer pushed a commit to reinvantveer/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2021
reinvantveer pushed a commit to reinvantveer/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants