Skip to content

🐛 Revert "✨ Wire up Service Account (#1038)" #1072

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

This reverts commit 95b9f0d.

Description

This reverts the #1038, which breaks the standard install of OLMv1.

It appears that the code from #1038 still requires the OLMv1 system service account to have * / * / * permissions (or at least permission to list/watch everything).

The e2e tests from that PR pass because they layer * / * / * permissions back in for both the OLM SA and the ClusterExtension SA, which means that our SA features are essentially untested.

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@joelanford joelanford requested a review from a team as a code owner July 19, 2024 12:43
@joelanford joelanford changed the title Revert ":sparkles: Wire up Service Account (#1038)" 🐛 Revert "✨ Wire up Service Account (#1038)" Jul 19, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit bb4171f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/669a5f69f7ab3400083b9d94
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1072--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@joelanford
Copy link
Member Author

The "Verify PR title" test is failing because I have an Issue/PR number in the title. In this case, I think it makes sense for the title to reference the PR that we're reverting, so I'm going to ignore that error.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.85%. Comparing base (95b9f0d) to head (bb4171f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1072      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.59%   72.85%   +0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        1883     1864      -19     
==========================================
- Hits         1367     1358       -9     
+ Misses        377      371       -6     
+ Partials      139      135       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 55.51% <ø> (-0.68%) ⬇️
unit 45.01% <ø> (+0.45%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 19, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 19, 2024
@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 19, 2024
@joelanford joelanford removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jul 19, 2024
@joelanford joelanford closed this Jul 19, 2024
@joelanford joelanford deleted the revert-1038 branch July 19, 2024 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants