Skip to content

False negatives in extension-developer-e2e job #485

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
m1kola opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

False negatives in extension-developer-e2e job #485

m1kola opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@m1kola
Copy link
Member

m1kola commented Oct 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

As reported in #481 (comment) it seems like extension-developer-e2e job occassionally reports green when it should be be reporting red.

This allowed #444 to be merged without updating test data.
This was referenced Oct 24, 2023
Closed
Merged
@joelanford
Copy link
Member

Do we need to check metadata.generation == status.observedGeneration as a precondition for the other checks.

@m1kola
Copy link
Member Author

m1kola commented Oct 4, 2024

This job is now called extension-developer-e2e

@m1kola m1kola changed the title False negatives in operator-developer-e2e job False negatives in extension-developer-e2e job Oct 4, 2024
LalatenduMohanty pushed a commit to LalatenduMohanty/operator-controller that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2024
@tmshort
Add check for client in e2e (operator-framework#485)
0dbef9b 
Depending on how the e2e is run, we may not have a k8s client available.

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@m1kola @joelanford