Skip to content

Improper CRD name reported when a secondary CRD is missing #1539

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
metacosm opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Improper CRD name reported when a secondary CRD is missing #1539

metacosm opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@metacosm
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.

Comments

@metacosm
Copy link
Collaborator

The SDK will incorrectly always report that the missing CRD is the primary one even when the problem occurs when an informer starts without the associated CRD being deployed on the cluster for the associated secondary resource.
@metacosm metacosm added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Oct 12, 2022
@metacosm metacosm self-assigned this Oct 12, 2022
metacosm added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2022
@metacosm
fix: properly report missing CRDs from informers
26c9315 
Fixes #1539
metacosm added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2022
@metacosm
fix: properly report missing CRDs from informers
4908081 
Fixes #1539
metacosm added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2022
@metacosm
fix: properly report missing CRDs from informers (#1540)
bd03a1c 
Fixes #1539
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@metacosm metacosm

Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@metacosm