Skip to content

Conversation

@Fedosin
Copy link

@Fedosin Fedosin commented Aug 29, 2019

Now if CAPO cannot create an instance it ignores the error and continue operating as the deletion was successful.

This patch returns the error if something wrong happens.

Now if CAPO cannot create an instance it ignores the error
and continue operating as the deletion was successful.

This patch returns the error if something wrong happens.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Fedosin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1746015, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1746015: Return error if instance deletion fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 29, 2019
@tomassedovic
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Fedosin, tomassedovic

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Fedosin,tomassedovic]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit eba9484 into openshift:master Aug 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Fedosin: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1746015 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1746015: Return error if instance deletion fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

racheljpg pushed a commit to racheljpg/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
* Update kubeadm's config to alpha3

* Update kubelet version to 1.12.1

We had 1.9.4 in our templates. It's time to update the kubelet version.

This will require users of minikube <30 to also add `--minikube
kubernetes-version=v1.12.1` to their `clusterctl` command.

* Recommend using v1.12.1

Deployments using v1.10.0 are broken unless
`--feature-gates=CustomResourceSubresources=true` is passed to the
cluster creation and `.spec.subresources.status` is added to the CRD
definition.

Rather than doing that and forcing the use of an older version of k8s,
let's take this opportunity to update the minimum required version to
the latest available.
pierreprinetti pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
* Update kubeadm's config to alpha3

* Update kubelet version to 1.12.1

We had 1.9.4 in our templates. It's time to update the kubelet version.

This will require users of minikube <30 to also add `--minikube
kubernetes-version=v1.12.1` to their `clusterctl` command.

* Recommend using v1.12.1

Deployments using v1.10.0 are broken unless
`--feature-gates=CustomResourceSubresources=true` is passed to the
cluster creation and `.spec.subresources.status` is added to the CRD
definition.

Rather than doing that and forcing the use of an older version of k8s,
let's take this opportunity to update the minimum required version to
the latest available.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants