Skip to content

Conversation

@Fedosin
Copy link

@Fedosin Fedosin commented Aug 27, 2019

Now if CAPO cannot create an image it ignores the error and continue operating as the creation was successful.
This patch returns the error if something wrong happens.

Now if CAPO cannot create an image it ignores the error and continue
operating as the creation was successful.

This patch returns the error if something wrong happens.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Fedosin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1745939, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1745939: Return error if image creation fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 27, 2019
@tomassedovic
Copy link

/retest

The CI errors seem to be MOC connection issues. Looks like there was an outage.

@tomassedovic
Copy link

/hold
/lgtm

The e2e-openstack job is non-voting so I'm putting this on hold until the job passes.

@Fedosin this sounds like something we want to do upstream too. Would you please create that PR as well? We can merge this beforehand, but there's nothing OpenShift-specific about this change.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 28, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 28, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Fedosin, tomassedovic

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Fedosin,tomassedovic]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Fedosin
Copy link
Author

Fedosin commented Aug 29, 2019

@tomassedovic hi! thank you for the review...
the upstream code has been seriously refactored recently, so I need to check if this patch is still appropriate there

@Fedosin
Copy link
Author

Fedosin commented Aug 29, 2019

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 29, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9702f8b into openshift:master Aug 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Fedosin: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1745939 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1745939: Return error if image creation fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Fedosin Fedosin deleted the bug_1745939 branch August 29, 2019 09:58
racheljpg pushed a commit to racheljpg/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
This commit removes the Name field from the provider config. Instead of
accepting an arbitrary name, we should be using the one provided by the
machine resource itself.
pierreprinetti pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
This commit removes the Name field from the provider config. Instead of
accepting an arbitrary name, we should be using the one provided by the
machine resource itself.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants