Skip to content

Conversation

@iamemilio
Copy link

Enables machine-controller to use proxy from environment variables injected into the container.

This allows the provider client to be able to reach the proxy server,
and the openstack endpoints in a disconnected proxy environment.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from adduarte and mdbooth August 10, 2021 20:51
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 10, 2021

@iamemilio: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-byon c6a8075 link /test e2e-openstack-byon

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 11, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: EmilienM

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 11, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

16 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@iamemilio
Copy link
Author

Can we pause testing, or skip the byon test? It looks like the cluster is resource bottle necked, and this is probably not helping.

/meow

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2021

@iamemilio: cat image

In response to this:

Can we pause testing, or skip the byon test? It looks like the cluster is resource bottle necked, and this is probably not helping.

/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

@iamemilio

Can we pause testing, or skip the byon test?

What is preventing the merge is the lack of a BZ. The byon test is not voting.

Is this patch fixing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986540 perhaps?

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@MaysaMacedo
Copy link

@iamemilio I didn't notice with 4.9 the Proxy related ENV vars being defined on the container of machine-api-controllers on namespace openshift-machine-api. Were they there?

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

/hold
This is just for making openshift-bot stop the spam. Remove at your convenience

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 12, 2021
@iamemilio iamemilio changed the title Adds Proxy to provider client http transport Bug 1986540: Adds Proxy to provider client http transport Aug 12, 2021
@iamemilio
Copy link
Author

@MaysaMacedo I tested this with 4.7, and they were there. This patch allowed worker nodes to come up.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@iamemilio: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986540, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1986540: Adds Proxy to provider client http transport

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 12, 2021
@iamemilio
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@iamemilio: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email ([email protected]) for bug 1986540 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@iamemilio
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@iamemilio: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986540, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @eurijon

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: eurijon.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@iamemilio: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986540, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @eurijon

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@iamemilio
Copy link
Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 16, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit c1bb740 into openshift:master Aug 16, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 16, 2021

@iamemilio: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1986540 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1986540: Adds Proxy to provider client http transport

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@MaysaMacedo
Copy link

/cherry-pick release-4.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@MaysaMacedo: new pull request created: #199

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

pierreprinetti pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
Options for bootstrap provisioner changed in clustercli. Adjust README
accordingly.

Change-Id: I2f7a078e09daf87f7a4f85827737b75f2d0a9c5f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants