Skip to content

Conversation

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link

@Hamlin-Li Hamlin-Li commented Oct 22, 2025

Hi,
Can you help to review the patch? @eme64

Issue

Currently, in SLP when transform from (Bool + CmpU + CMove) to (VectorMaskCmp + VectorBlend), the unsigned-ness in CmpU is lost, then end up doing a signed instead of unsigned comparison in VectorMaskCmp.
For details please check code at SuperWordVTransformBuilder::make_vector_vtnode_for_pack and PackSet::get_bool_test.

 Fix

Currently, BoolTest does not support an unsigned construction (BoolTest( mask btm ) : _test(btm) { assert((btm & unsigned_compare) == 0, "unsupported");}), seems to me a feasible solution would be get the unsigned information from CmpU (which could be an input of Bool) and pass it to VectorMaskCmp.

Thanks

This pr could also lead to more optimizations, like: #25336 and #25341.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8370481: C2 SuperWord: Long/Integer.compareUnsigned return wrong value in SLP (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27942/head:pull/27942
$ git checkout pull/27942

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27942
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27942/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27942

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27942

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27942.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back mli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@Hamlin-Li This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8370481: C2 SuperWord: Long/Integer.compareUnsigned return wrong value in SLP

Reviewed-by: epeter, tonyp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 148 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@Hamlin-Li The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 22, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Hamlin-Li That looks like a great improvement :)

All I am missing are some test cases. And if possible: IR rules 😉

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

@Hamlin-Li That looks like a great improvement :)

Thank you for having a look! :)

All I am missing are some test cases. And if possible: IR rules 😉

Yes, I also added some tests and IR rules of course. :)

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

/solves JDK-8370481

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2025

@Hamlin-Li
Adding additional issue to solves list: 8370481: C2 SuperWord: Long/Integer.compareUnsigned return wrong value in SLP.

@eme64
Copy link
Contributor

eme64 commented Oct 23, 2025

@Hamlin-Li
I just looked at your Bug report JDK-8370481.
Can you add a reproducer, and on what platforms you have experienced the failure?

If you are fixing a bug here, we should focus on the bug only. After all, we may want to backport the bugfix.

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

@eme64 I just keep Op_CmpI/L.
Test running, will update the result or code accordingly later.

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

@eme64 I just keep Op_CmpI/L. Test running, will update the result or code accordingly later.

I ran all the tests under test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler on x86, the default case (i.e. ShouldNotReachHere) is not triggerred. Plus github CI, I think we are good at these switch cases.

Copy link
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks really good now (modulo one tiny suggestion).

I'll run some internal testing now...

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

The code looks really good now (modulo one tiny suggestion).

Fixed with github help, thanks for the suggestion! :)

I'll run some internal testing now...

Thank you!

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

Hi, while @eme64 running some tests, can someone else have another look at this pr? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Testing passed - Approved. Thanks for all the work, and looking forward to what you have still planned :)

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 28, 2025
@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

Testing passed - Approved. Thanks for all the work, and looking forward to what you have still planned :)

@eme64 Thank you for reviewing and testing!
I'll tag you when I send out other prs. :)

Copy link
Contributor

@gctony gctony left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

LGTM

@gctony Thank you for reviewing! :)

@Hamlin-Li
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Going to push as commit eab5644.
Since your change was applied there have been 148 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 29, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 29, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 29, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 29, 2025

@Hamlin-Li Pushed as commit eab5644.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants