Skip to content

Conversation

@Hornochs
Copy link
Contributor

@Hornochs Hornochs commented Feb 4, 2025

Goal of this PR is to Fix Issue #31

With this necessary changes:

Testing this for other is not that easy, I can't put an online Server like on Nadeo titles because the communication happens over Broadcasts, which can't be routed via Internet. So there needs to be a UT3 Server hosted local in your network, even in the same VLAN!

There are more ways to test it:

  1. On a LinuxVM install yourself a UT3 Dedicated Server: https://linuxgsm.com/servers/ut3server/
  2. Download a prepared UT3 Dedicated Server from my webspace: https://static.3fu.de/ut3server.tgz - Caution! Package Dependencies are not fulfilled, look in the linuxgsm Link what packages are needed to be installed.
  3. Run on your windows machine UT3 and start a LAN Server

@BattlefieldDuck
Copy link
Member

Can you also generate the tests results by handler.enable_save = True? Thanks.

@Hornochs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hornochs commented Feb 4, 2025

Sure, new Test results are there

@BattlefieldDuck
Copy link
Member

Can you run the tests with handler.enable_save = True locally? It should generate the protocol response files, then you can comment the # handler.enable_save = True like other tests case.

So an example response of the protocol will be visible on the docs. 😄

@Hornochs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hornochs commented Feb 4, 2025

So an example response of the protocol will be visible on the docs. 😄

Aaaah lol! Sure is appended :)

@BattlefieldDuck BattlefieldDuck merged commit cc27fa9 into opengsq:main Feb 4, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@Hornochs Hornochs deleted the add-udk-ut3 branch February 11, 2025 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants