Skip to content

Conversation

@vrabaud
Copy link
Contributor

@vrabaud vrabaud commented May 24, 2024

  • edges could be modified
  • 2 sets of iterations were always done even if the first set did not return any change
  • countNonZero is slow compared to hasNonZero

Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
  • The PR is proposed to the proper branch
  • There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
  • There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
    Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.

@vrabaud vrabaud requested a review from asmorkalov May 24, 2024 09:35
vrabaud added 2 commits May 28, 2024 14:58
- edges could be modified
- 2 sets of iterations were always done even if the first set did
  not return any change
- countNonZero is slow compared to hasNonZero
Copy link
Contributor

@asmorkalov asmorkalov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@asmorkalov asmorkalov merged commit d131e7a into opencv:4.x May 30, 2024
@vrabaud vrabaud deleted the thinning branch May 30, 2024 13:18
@mshabunin mshabunin mentioned this pull request Jun 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants