Skip to content

fs/ufs: remove erroneous return statement #4752

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

edgargabriel
Copy link
Member

an erroneous return statement has creeped in commit 1885d99
which leads to some processes not resetting stripe_size
and stripe_count correctly. This can lead in 3.0.x to different
fcoll modules being selected. The impact is not that dramatic on
master and 3.1.x, but could lead to problems as well.

Fixes #4745

This is equivalen to commit 22a2b99
on master. I did not cherry pick, since they are some differences in the
fs/lustre component and I did not want to introduce those
changes in this commit.

Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit f31f4b2)

an erroneous return statement has creeped in commit 1885d99
which leads to some processes not resetting stripe_size
and stripe_count correctly. This can lead in 3.0.x to different
fcoll modules being selected. The impact is not that dramatic on
master and 3.1.x, but could lead to problems as well.

Fixes open-mpi#4745

This is equivalen to commit 22a2b99
on master. I did not cherry pick, since they are some differences in the
fs/lustre component and I did not want to introduce those
changes in this commit.

Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f31f4b2)
@edgargabriel edgargabriel added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Jan 24, 2018
@bwbarrett bwbarrett merged commit b349659 into open-mpi:v3.1.x Jan 30, 2018
@edgargabriel edgargabriel deleted the pr/v3.1.x-fs_ufs_bad_return_statement branch March 21, 2018 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants