Skip to content

Conversation

@jamescarr
Copy link
Contributor

This PR

  • bring FlagEvaluationDetails in-line with the spec

Related Issues

Fixes #98

Notes

Follow-up Tasks

How to test

make test TEST=tests/test_open_feature_flag_evaluation.py

@jamescarr jamescarr force-pushed the evaluation-details-reason branch 2 times, most recently from 9534a2f to 2946e01 Compare June 28, 2023 16:40
@beeme1mr beeme1mr changed the title Add tests for fleg_details Add tests for flag_details Jun 28, 2023
@jamescarr jamescarr force-pushed the evaluation-details-reason branch from 15e9036 to 94dc60c Compare June 28, 2023 17:16
@jamescarr jamescarr changed the title Add tests for flag_details feat!: EvaluationDetails.reason should be a string, Reason enum should export default reasons per spec Jun 28, 2023
… export default set of reasons.

Signed-off-by: James Carr <[email protected]>
@jamescarr jamescarr force-pushed the evaluation-details-reason branch from 94dc60c to 2d6b6cd Compare June 28, 2023 17:19
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #126 (2d6b6cd) into main (959159e) will increase coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #126      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.93%   93.09%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines         354      362       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          329      337       +8     
  Misses         25       25              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 93.09% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...feature/flag_evaluation/flag_evaluation_details.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
open_feature/flag_evaluation/reason.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@toddbaert toddbaert requested review from ajhelsby, hlipsig, tcarrio and toddbaert and removed request for ajhelsby June 28, 2023 17:34
Copy link
Member

@toddbaert toddbaert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a Python novice, but from a spec POV this looks right to me.

Awaiting one more review (hopefully from somebody with more Python chops 😅 )

@beeme1mr beeme1mr merged commit c2d225e into open-feature:main Jun 28, 2023
@jamescarr jamescarr deleted the evaluation-details-reason branch June 28, 2023 18:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

EvaluationDetails should be a string, SDK should export list of standard Reasons.

3 participants