Skip to content

Conversation

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

Rename the package to iojs. No Conflicts: header is necessary because
the package was already marked as conflicting with the Fedora nodejs
package.

R=@rvagg, possibly useful for nodejs/build#18.

@piscisaureus piscisaureus added the wip Issues and PRs that are still a work in progress. label Dec 4, 2014
@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Dec 4, 2014

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is "io.js" lowercased even if it starts a sentence?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes please

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this case we should note it somewhere like npm guys did. Maybe in readme.

Rename the package to iojs.  No Conflicts: header is necessary because
the package was already marked as conflicting with the Fedora nodejs
package.

PR-URL: nodejs#71
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
Rename the .spec file from node.spec to iojs.spec and update the build
script.  Done as a separate commit to not obscure the changes from the
previous commit.

PR-URL: nodejs#71
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis merged commit 993fadb into nodejs:v0.12 Dec 5, 2014
bnoordhuis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2014
@piscisaureus piscisaureus removed the wip Issues and PRs that are still a work in progress. label Dec 5, 2014
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis deleted the rename-spec-file branch December 5, 2014 21:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants