Skip to content

doc: clarify release candidate stability index #59295

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

panva
Copy link
Member

@panva panva commented Jul 31, 2025

This PR updates the Experimental 1.2 - Release candidate stability index to indicate that changes may occur not only because of user feedback but also, in some cases, due to the underlying specification late development changes.

I wish to be able to mark upcoming Web Cryptography additions 1.1 - Active development with runtime experimental warning but when the dust around the WICG spec settles I wish to remove the experimental warning and mark them as 1.2 - Release candidate.

However, given past experience it may take a long time before the features get merged into the main Web Cryptography spec and in those cases I wish to reserve the option to reflect last minute changes to the spec in the implementation.

cc @nodejs/tsc

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Jul 31, 2025
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Jul 31, 2025

@nodejs/next-10 Not sure where would be the correct place to ask, but it'd be interesting next time we do a survey to ask whether the ecosystem uses the different experimental stages

@panva panva added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jul 31, 2025
@panva panva added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jul 31, 2025
@marco-ippolito
Copy link
Member

@nodejs/next-10 Not sure where would be the correct place to ask, but it'd be interesting next time we do a survey to ask whether the ecosystem uses the different experimental stages

You can start an issue in the next10 repo, where we can gather suggestions for 2026 survey

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.