Skip to content

Conversation

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under #5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but uses it as part of what it is testing so its included in
those disabled.

@mhdawson mhdawson added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Feb 10, 2016
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be better with test-async-wrap-check-providers to handle it in the test itself, otherwise you might be missing out on some real regressions (it's a test that tests a number of subsystems, fs.watch() is just one of them.)

If you do, you should note it in the comment here so it's not forgotten about.

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

Left a suggestion but LGTM if you don't want to take it.

@mscdex mscdex added the fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. label Feb 10, 2016
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

Good point, I'll take a look at test-async-wrap-check-providers to look at just excluding the required part.

fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under nodejs#5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but part of the test uses it so that part has been skipped for
AIX
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@bnoordhuis updated

@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Feb 11, 2016
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Feb 13, 2016

LGTM

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2016
fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under #5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but part of the test uses it so that part has been skipped for
AIX

PR-URL: #5187
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

landed as 6a85ad9

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

CI run to confirm on AIX: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-aix/46/

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

confirmed we are down to the 1 unrelated failure in the AIX runs, closing

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Feb 16, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2016
fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under #5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but part of the test uses it so that part has been skipped for
AIX

PR-URL: #5187
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2016
fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under #5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but part of the test uses it so that part has been skipped for
AIX

PR-URL: #5187
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2016
fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under #5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but part of the test uses it so that part has been skipped for
AIX

PR-URL: #5187
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2016
stefanmb pushed a commit to stefanmb/node that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2016
fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under nodejs#5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but part of the test uses it so that part has been skipped for
AIX

PR-URL: nodejs#5187
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2016
fs watch currently needs special configuration on AIX and we
want to improve under #5085.
Tests are disabled so CI can be green and we can spot other
regressions until this work is complete.

test-async-wrap-check-providers does not aim to test fs watch
but part of the test uses it so that part has been skipped for
AIX

PR-URL: #5187
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@mhdawson mhdawson deleted the aixfs branch March 15, 2017 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants