test: add coverage for napi_typeof #13990
Conversation
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and covers cases that were not being covered.
nodejs-github-bot
added
node-api
| assert.strictEqual(test_general.testGetVersion(), 1); | ||
|
|
||
| [123, 'test string', function() {}, new Object(), true, | ||
| undefined, Symbol()].forEach((val) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Small readability nit
[
123,
'test string',
function() {},
new Object(),
true,
undefined,
Symbol()
].forEach( ... )
|
|
||
| napi_value result; | ||
| if (object_type == napi_number) { | ||
| NAPI_CALL(env ,napi_create_number(env, 42, &result)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comma after env is misaligned.
| napi_value args[1]; | ||
| NAPI_CALL(env, napi_get_cb_info(env, info, &argc, args, NULL, NULL)); | ||
|
|
||
| napi_valuetype object_type; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think something like argument_type would be more descriptive of what this variable is.
|
|
||
| [123, 'test string', function() {}, new Object(), true, | ||
| undefined, Symbol()].forEach((val) => { | ||
| assert.strictEqual(typeof val, typeof (test_general.testNapiTypeof(val))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this test is specifically for napi_typeof(), I don't understand why test_general.testNapiTypeof() returns a value of that type instead of just a string representing the type. Then, this assertion could be:
assert.strictEqual(typeof val, test_general.testNapiTypeof(val));
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That would probably work as well. Just not what I can up with. I'll take a look as its probably an easy change.
|
Pushed commit to address comments. |
| napi_value result; | ||
| NAPI_CALL(env, napi_get_version(env, &version)); | ||
| NAPI_CALL(env ,napi_create_number(env, version, &result)); | ||
| NAPI_CALL(env,napi_create_number(env, version, &result)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing a space after the first comma.
| undefined, | ||
| Symbol() | ||
| ].forEach((val) => { | ||
| assert.strictEqual(typeof val, test_general.testNapiTypeof(val)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh. A tiny nit here and on line 52. I think the parameter order should be switched to reflect actual, expected
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for catching that will update.
|
Pushed commit to address final comments CI run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/8994/ |
|
Landed as 34cf8ad |
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and covers cases that were not being covered. PR-URL: #13990 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
|
This test is failing consistently for me locally on macOS. |
|
Running |
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and covers cases that were not being covered. PR-URL: #13990 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and covers cases that were not being covered. PR-URL: #13990 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and covers cases that were not being covered. PR-URL: #13990 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and covers cases that were not being covered. PR-URL: nodejs#13990 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and covers cases that were not being covered. Backport-PR-URL: #19447 PR-URL: #13990 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
6 participants
We had some, but not complete coverage indirectly through
other tests. Add test to validate it specifically and
covers cases that were not being covered.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test, n-api