- 
          
 - 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 33.7k
 
src: round nsec instead of truncating stat times #12607
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Closed
      
      
    
  
     Closed
                    Changes from 8 commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            10 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      fc381a3
              
                lib,src: round fs stat times to nearest ms
              
              
                sciolist 4e113b9
              
                use common iswindows in test
              
              
                sciolist a474c1a
              
                scientific notation for stat times
              
              
                sciolist 3e5afc1
              
                test - use tounixtimestamp instead of floor
              
              
                sciolist 519150d
              
                swap lines back, no reason for why i swapped them to begin with
              
              
                sciolist a6268a8
              
                use string to create new test case to fix x86 overflow
              
              
                sciolist ac3bfa5
              
                use (Date.now()/1000) instead of -1 to test utimes
              
              
                sciolist bad1f6f
              
                restore -1 test and allow up to 2 seconds diff in test results
              
              
                sciolist 96b8712
              
                Merge remote-tracking branch 'node/master'
              
              
                sciolist 32c1639
              
                add comment explaining +0.5
              
              
                sciolist File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              | Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | 
|---|---|---|
| 
          
            
          
           | 
    @@ -475,9 +475,9 @@ void FillStatsArray(double* fields, const uv_stat_t* s) { | |
| fields[9] = -1; | ||
| #endif | ||
| // Dates. | ||
| #define X(idx, name) \ | ||
| fields[idx] = (static_cast<double>(s->st_##name.tv_sec) * 1000) + \ | ||
| (static_cast<double>(s->st_##name.tv_nsec / 1000000)); \ | ||
| #define X(idx, name) \ | ||
| fields[idx] = (s->st_##name.tv_sec * 1e3) + \ | ||
| (s->st_##name.tv_nsec / 1e6); \ | ||
| 
         There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ohh yeah, I didn't follow the braces, assumed it was the same as the line above...  | 
||
| 
     | 
||
| X(10, atim) | ||
| X(11, mtim) | ||
| 
          
            
          
           | 
    ||
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice trick :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know right.. wish it was my idea. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mind placing a comment above these. I can see someone doing a refactor a year from now and accidentally removing this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, these lines no longer exist though, but the +0.5s are still around and have been merged in. I'll add the comment. With #13173 the +0.5s aren't quite as needed anymore, since the goes away if you use
mtimeMsetc. instead ofmtime.