Skip to content

Conversation

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Mar 21, 2015

Proposing a NAN Working Group and the move of the nan and node-addon-examples (to be renamed "addon-examples") repos to the iojs org.

Corresponding proposal to the NAN owners is here, note that it's already run as an open project in a similar model to io.js so this needs to be agreed upon there too. Initial WG members would be those listed on the NAN README although that's not quite final because there's a couple of people who may be removed due to inactivity (it'll be their choice).

@yosuke-furukawa
Copy link
Member

+1

But I like more general Working Group name. NAN stands for Native Abstractions for Node.js.
Native Abstractions WG or Native Addon WG is more suitable. :)

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Mar 22, 2015

Good call @yosuke-furukawa, I've changed it to the "Addon API Working Group" but am open to alternative suggestions.

@mscdex mscdex added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Mar 22, 2015
@brendanashworth
Copy link
Contributor

Should this be tc-agenda? I think the TC would ratify this, right?

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

I think this can be closed now? The WG was unanimously accepted in Wednesday's TC meeting.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

I think it needs to be rebased, but it should be merged.

PR-URL: nodejs#1226
Reviewed-By: Yosuke Furukawa <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: TC
@rvagg rvagg merged commit 12e51d5 into nodejs:v1.x Apr 15, 2015
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Apr 15, 2015

landed @ 12e51d5

@rvagg rvagg deleted the nan-wg branch April 15, 2015 06:34
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Apr 15, 2015

please welcome the new @iojs/addon-api team

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

\o/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants