Skip to content

TEST/STY: Travis errors #568

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2017
Merged

TEST/STY: Travis errors #568

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2017

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Member

Fixes some Travis issues.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.254% when pulling d0c9e36 on effigies:fix/travis into b2c0f81 on nipy:master.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 24, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #568 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #568   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.32%   94.32%           
=======================================
  Files         177      177           
  Lines       24691    24691           
  Branches     2638     2638           
=======================================
  Hits        23290    23290           
  Misses        925      925           
  Partials      476      476
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nibabel/ecat.py 85.79% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/tripwire.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/tests/test_image_api.py 99.04% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b2c0f81...d0c9e36. Read the comment docs.

@effigies
Copy link
Member Author

@matthew-brett These are minor fixes. Plan to merge tomorrow AM, unless you have objections.

@effigies effigies merged commit b1bf5e7 into nipy:master Oct 25, 2017
@effigies effigies deleted the fix/travis branch October 25, 2017 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants