Skip to content

MRG: test fixes and doc updates for multiframe code #442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 11, 2016

Conversation

matthew-brett
Copy link
Member

Fixes to some new test failures at : https://travis-ci.org/matthew-brett/nibabel/builds/121846880

More links to sections and diagrams on multi-frame / enhanced MR image
IOP.

Follow-up to PR #439.

@matthew-brett matthew-brett changed the title DOC: add more links on DICOM multi-frame MRG: test fixes and doc updates for multiframe code Apr 9, 2016
@matthew-brett
Copy link
Member Author

@embaker - I found some small stuff that I hadn't spotted, that needed cleaning up.

@matthew-brett matthew-brett force-pushed the more-multiframe-links branch from e960206 to 92c93e0 Compare April 9, 2016 01:57
More links to sections and diagrams on multi-frame / enhanced MR image
IOP.
PEP8 fussy about exact number of blank lines.
Require DICOM for multiframe image shape tests.
Whitespace changes only.
@matthew-brett matthew-brett force-pushed the more-multiframe-links branch from 92c93e0 to bf0b018 Compare April 10, 2016 06:35
@effigies
Copy link
Member

LGTM. Is there a reason that PRs are no longer built on the nipy Travis account?

@matthew-brett
Copy link
Member Author

Hmm - good question about travis-ci and PRs - it seems it got turned off somehow - I turned it back on.

@matthew-brett
Copy link
Member Author

@embaker - any comment here before I merge?

@matthew-brett
Copy link
Member Author

I'll merge to make it easier to test other PRs - bit please do add any comments here, I'll address them with another PR.

@matthew-brett matthew-brett merged commit 64333e6 into nipy:master Apr 11, 2016
@embaker
Copy link
Contributor

embaker commented Apr 11, 2016

No comments. Looks good to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants