MAINT: Revisit warnings filter #396
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mgxd
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2024
24.1.0 (October 02, 2024) This new minor release includes a few bug fixes, such as excluding MCRIBS from surface reconstruction without a precomputed segmentation and ensuring generated derivatives are not masked, as well as improvements to reporting. * ENH: Add boilerplate, errors to report (#403) * ENH: Add age to session report (#402) * ENH: Improvements to age parsing (#395, #398) * FIX: MCRIBS auto surface reconstruction logic (#399) * FIX: Do not force masking of anatomicals when using `--derivatives` (#400) * MAINT: Revisit warnings filter (#396) * MAINT: Automate testing with tox (#404) * MAINT: Port over parser arguments and tests from fmriprep (#401)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This address the discussion in #352 - has come up while testing #395 as well.
First, let's see how noisy it is without any filtering.