Skip to content

Sync dockerfiles after taging 1.0.1 #111

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

MaciejKaras
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaciejKaras MaciejKaras commented May 13, 2025

Summary

Sync dockerfiles after release of 1.0.1 version

Proof of Work

Not needed.

Checklist

  • Have you linked a jira ticket and/or is the ticket in the title?
  • Have you checked whether your jira ticket required DOCSP changes?
  • Have you checked for release_note changes?

Reminder (Please remove this when merging)

  • Please try to Approve or Reject Changes the PR, keep PRs in review as short as possible
  • Our Short Guide for PRs: Link
  • Remember the following Communication Standards - use comment prefixes for clarity:
    • blocking: Must be addressed before approval.
    • follow-up: Can be addressed in a later PR or ticket.
    • q: Clarifying question.
    • nit: Non-blocking suggestions.
    • note: Side-note, non-actionable. Example: Praise
    • --> no prefix is considered a question

@MaciejKaras MaciejKaras changed the base branch from master to release-1.0 May 13, 2025 11:18
@MaciejKaras MaciejKaras marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2025 11:19
@MaciejKaras MaciejKaras requested a review from a team as a code owner May 13, 2025 11:19
@MaciejKaras MaciejKaras enabled auto-merge (squash) May 13, 2025 11:22
@MaciejKaras MaciejKaras merged commit 587334d into release-1.0 May 13, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@MaciejKaras MaciejKaras mentioned this pull request May 14, 2025
3 tasks
MaciejKaras added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
# Summary

Sync dockerfiles after release of `1.0.1` version

## Proof of Work

Not needed.

## Checklist
- [ ] Have you linked a jira ticket and/or is the ticket in the title?
- [ ] Have you checked whether your jira ticket required DOCSP changes?
- [ ] Have you checked for release_note changes?

## Reminder (Please remove this when merging)
- Please try to Approve or Reject Changes the PR, keep PRs in review as
short as possible
- Our Short Guide for PRs:
[Link](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T93KUtdvONq43vfTfUt8l92uo4e4SEEvFbIEKOxGr44/edit?tab=t.0)
- Remember the following Communication Standards - use comment prefixes
for clarity:
  * **blocking**: Must be addressed before approval.
  * **follow-up**: Can be addressed in a later PR or ticket.
  * **q**: Clarifying question.
  * **nit**: Non-blocking suggestions.
  * **note**: Side-note, non-actionable. Example: Praise 
  * --> no prefix is considered a question
MaciejKaras added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
# Summary

Sync dockerfiles after release of `1.0.1` version

## Proof of Work

Not needed.

## Checklist
- [ ] Have you linked a jira ticket and/or is the ticket in the title?
- [ ] Have you checked whether your jira ticket required DOCSP changes?
- [ ] Have you checked for release_note changes?

## Reminder (Please remove this when merging)
- Please try to Approve or Reject Changes the PR, keep PRs in review as
short as possible
- Our Short Guide for PRs:
[Link](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T93KUtdvONq43vfTfUt8l92uo4e4SEEvFbIEKOxGr44/edit?tab=t.0)
- Remember the following Communication Standards - use comment prefixes
for clarity:
  * **blocking**: Must be addressed before approval.
  * **follow-up**: Can be addressed in a later PR or ticket.
  * **q**: Clarifying question.
  * **nit**: Non-blocking suggestions.
  * **note**: Side-note, non-actionable. Example: Praise 
  * --> no prefix is considered a question
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants