Skip to content

Conversation

@baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

This PR enables codeql scanning for the driver. Scans are run nightly, as well as when a PR is opened against main.

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Fill in title or leave empty for no highlight

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@nbbeeken nbbeeken self-assigned this May 22, 2024
@nbbeeken nbbeeken added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label May 22, 2024
nbbeeken
nbbeeken previously approved these changes May 22, 2024
@baileympearson baileympearson requested a review from nbbeeken May 22, 2024 15:34
@nbbeeken nbbeeken merged commit 61c8949 into main May 22, 2024
@nbbeeken nbbeeken deleted the baileympearson-patch-1 branch May 22, 2024 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants