Skip to content

Conversation

berndbischl
Copy link
Member

@ja-thomas
do we still need this?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 5, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.005% when pulling df41802 on exportReqParNames into 82b8149 on master.

@ja-thomas
Copy link
Contributor

We wanted to use that in mlrMBO, but I think it's not necessary anymore

@berndbischl
Copy link
Member Author

ok i looked at this.
i still think this is useful and not much effort.

can you pls doc and (extend) test?
also it is probably better to have "getRequiredParams" and return a parset?
(as you can easily get the ids from that)

@berndbischl berndbischl changed the title export export getRequiredParams Jan 6, 2017
@berndbischl
Copy link
Member Author

looks like we have this in PR #159?

@jakob-r jakob-r added this to the v1.12 milestone Jun 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants