Don’t allow an object literal with a spread as a fallback for destructuring a property not present in all constituents #43783
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #43174
#31711 allowed object literals as fallbacks for destructuring, such that
const { x } = foo || {}
was allowed even though{}
has no propertyx
. The only criteria for an object constituent of a union to be considered to have{ [key: string]: undefined }
index signature was that it be an object literal—the common pattern seems to be an empty object literal, but any object literal ought to avoid excess property pitfalls through aliasing.... except, that logic neglected spreads, which could introduce arbitrary extra properties of arbitrary types, as demonstrated in #43174.