Skip to content

Conversation

@rbuckton
Copy link
Contributor

Updates @typescript-eslint/* to 3.4.1-alpha.1 which includes support for ||=, &&=, and ??=.

Copy link
Member

@weswigham weswigham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Know about when we'll be able to move back to a stable version?

@uniqueiniquity
Copy link
Contributor

@weswigham Stable versions release every Monday.

@rbuckton rbuckton merged commit d610bbd into master Jun 25, 2020
@rbuckton rbuckton deleted the update-ts-eslint branch June 25, 2020 21:38
cangSDARM added a commit to cangSDARM/TypeScript that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2020
* upstream/master:
  LEGO: check in for master to temporary branch.
  Preserve newlines between try/catch/finally, if/else, do/while (microsoft#39280)
  not narrow static property without type annotation in constructor. (microsoft#39252)
  Switch to ES Map/Set internally (microsoft#33771)
  fix(38840): omit completions for a spread like argument in a function definition (microsoft#38897)
  fix(38785): include in NavigationBar child items from default exported functions (microsoft#38915)
  LEGO: check in for master to temporary branch.
  LEGO: check in for master to temporary branch.
  Avoid effect of element access expression (microsoft#39174)
  Update typescript-eslint to 3.4.1-alpha.1 (microsoft#39260)
  Handle 'keyof' for generic tuple types (microsoft#39218)
  Disable unsound T[K] rule in subtype relations (microsoft#39249)
  LEGO: check in for master to temporary branch.
  Upgrade typescript-eslint version (microsoft#39242)
  Handle recursive type references up to a certain level of expansion in inference (microsoft#38011)
  Do not consider binding patterns in contextual types for return type inference where all the signature type parameters have defaults (microsoft#39081)
  LEGO: check in for master to temporary branch.

# Conflicts:
#	src/compiler/program.ts
#	src/compiler/types.ts
@microsoft microsoft locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants