Skip to content

Conversation

weswigham
Copy link
Member

This should allow me to split the now very long user test work across multiple containers

@weswigham weswigham marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2019 22:52
@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jun 28, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at 7aeaeb3. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster again, maybe this time i'll get an artifact for each shard 🤷‍♂

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jun 29, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at f5a6d91. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster let's see the last stage get triggered on failure this time pls, thanks

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jun 29, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at f5a6d91. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster - now that the trigger conditions for the last job are no longer still inverted from the old build 😆

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jun 29, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at f5a6d91. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster once more

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jul 1, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at c599ea5. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster once again

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jul 1, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at c599ea5. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

The user suite test run you requested has finished and failed. I've opened a PR with the baseline diff from master.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster once more, but this time while actually building tsc.js 😛

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jul 1, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at c599ea5. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

The user suite test run you requested has finished and failed. I've opened a PR with the baseline diff from master.

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

Sweet, test now returns the expected diff pr, all good. Now to rebase onto master and double check it can pass :V

@weswigham
Copy link
Member Author

@typescript-bot user test this faster one last time (hopefully) - gimmie that green check

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Jul 1, 2019

Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at fc0f2dc. You can monitor the build here. It should now contribute to this PR's status checks.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

The user suite test run you requested has finished and failed. I've opened a PR with the baseline diff from master.

@weswigham weswigham merged commit 3e68561 into microsoft:master Jul 1, 2019
@weswigham weswigham deleted the test-sharding branch July 1, 2019 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants