Pipe function + `React.memo` returns component with `any` props

[OliverJAsh]

TypeScript Version: 3.9.2

Search Terms: generic pipe pipeWith react memo HOC props any

Code

import * as React from 'react';

declare function pipeWith<A, B>(a: A, ab: (a: A) => B): B;

type Props = { foo: number };
declare const MyComponent: React.FunctionComponent<Props>;

// ✅ correct props type
// React.NamedExoticComponent<Props>
const r1 = React.memo(MyComponent);

// ❌ `any` props type
// React.MemoExoticComponent<React.ComponentType<any>>
const r2 = pipeWith(MyComponent, React.memo);

// Workaround
// ✅ correct props type
// React.NamedExoticComponent<Props>
const r3 = pipeWith(MyComponent, (C) => React.memo(C));

Using latest version of @types/react (at the time of writing: 16.9.35).

Expected behavior:

See above.

Actual behavior:

See above.

Playground Link:

https://stackblitz.com/edit/react-ts-4ih6jn

Related Issues:

#25637, although that was closed as a duplicate of an issue which has since been closed (#10957), so I decided to post a new issue.

[RyanCavanaugh]

What's the definition of memo ?

[OliverJAsh]

https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/e3313c33a10b59c1515074d045d31fd463e79098/types/react/index.d.ts#L847-L854

[RyanCavanaugh]

If someone can provide an isolated repro we can investigate

[dragomirtitian]

@RyanCavanaugh Hope this helps:

// The presence of any overloads confuses inference, leave just one of them in and everything works
declare function memo<T>(Component: T): T;
declare function memo<T>(Component: T): T;

declare function pipeWith<A, B>(a: A, ab: (a: A) => B): B;

type Props = { foo: number };
declare const MyComponent: Props;

// ✅ correct props type
// Props
const r1 = memo(MyComponent);

// ❌ `unknown` props type
// unknown
const r2 = pipeWith(MyComponent, memo);

// Workaround
// ✅ correct props type
// Props
const r3 = pipeWith(MyComponent, (C) => memo(C));

Playground Link

Just the presence of any overloads will confuse the inference on the original use case. Leave just the one signature and everything works as expected.

[lifeiscontent]

@RyanCavanaugh here's a reproduction

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/JYWwDg9gTgLgBAKjgQwM5wEoFNkGN4BmUEIcARFDvmQNwBQdMAnmFnAArKUB2M7xYVAB4AasgA2AVywA+OAF44Abzpw4AEywFkk8TDFSsAfgBccA9PpqAbhOmnzdrFbgRuAYQAWybgHMsZgAUtoZmFlgAlApy1hDA6i64nsDi6jwmqmpwAD6YVDAAdNh4MACi4lggWLxCXinq-BCCok4yMplqucX4RfnlldUwtcmpjc3hbQDaALr0AL70dASS3PjAbhxcgwCS4OIthjKBYAKoZpw8fKcH0jJRKmqUMJJQ3HCBHXBC6sDW7VlZJTdQp1VI8AogZBgY6nApJeo8AA073hqSi8n+AKyqPUBWYrAU8kUoPUnyxcCMeRKcPEbiw-SqvECOORD3J7KSWFwAGssOozCcmqgCiFpITFDiCoLBCKnIiyey1G4vD5-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