Skip to content

Conversation

@tcare
Copy link
Contributor

@tcare tcare commented Mar 3, 2020

  • Factored out architecture details to point to the dedicated architecture article, which also is being updated with the extra info in the README. This article will need to be merged before this PR can be merged
  • Minor wording, grammar, and whitespace fixes

tcare added 2 commits March 3, 2020 12:32
- Whitespace fixes
- Grammar fixes
- Ported some wording from Getting Started
We don't need to go through the architecture in detail here. There's an
entire article dedicated to it. A separate change will be needed for the
article.
@tcare tcare requested a review from dtzar March 3, 2020 20:37
tcare added a commit to tcare/architecture-center that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2020
…Python

We have evolved our README with additional information on the architecture of MLOpsPython. We want to remove the majority of the architecture text from there and link to this article instead. See microsoft/MLOpsPython#220 for more details.
@tcare tcare requested a review from dtzar March 4, 2020 18:02
ktoliver pushed a commit to MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2020
…Python

We have evolved our README with additional information on the architecture of MLOpsPython. We want to remove the majority of the architecture text from there and link to this article instead. See microsoft/MLOpsPython#220 for more details.
@tcare tcare merged commit 806f042 into master Mar 5, 2020
@dtzar dtzar deleted the tcare/readme branch March 5, 2020 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants