Skip to content

JobVerificationEngine DAG construction (no driver assigned partition IDs), New Aggregate Integration #131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Feb 9, 2021

Conversation

andrewlawhh
Copy link
Collaborator

Refactor JobVerificationEngine removing trust from driver (no jobID assigned by driver)

  • Create graph based on input/output MACs.

Andrew Law and others added 27 commits October 1, 2020 18:14
* add date_add, interval sql still running into issues

* Add Interval SQL support

* uncomment out the other tests

* resolve comments

* change interval equality

Co-authored-by: Eric Feng <[email protected]>
@andrewlawhh andrewlawhh changed the title Comp integrity JobVerificationEngine DAG construction (no driver assigned partition IDs) Dec 14, 2020
Andrew Law added 2 commits December 14, 2020 17:35
@andrewlawhh andrewlawhh self-assigned this Feb 2, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@wzheng wzheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Partial review

Copy link
Member

@chester-leung chester-leung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also delete the commented out print statements / old code? I left comments at some places but not all.

@andrewlawhh andrewlawhh merged commit a95f2c7 into mc2-project:comp-integrity Feb 9, 2021
@andrewlawhh andrewlawhh changed the title JobVerificationEngine DAG construction (no driver assigned partition IDs) JobVerificationEngine DAG construction (no driver assigned partition IDs), New Aggregate Integration Feb 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants