Skip to content

Refine assertJSONEquivalent so that it is more forgiving. #213

@mihaelamj

Description

@mihaelamj

The function assertJSONEquivalent that is only used in the testing suite, should be a bit more forgiving when comparing JSON strings.
Here's a ghist demonstrating a failing test for JSON strings that should be considered equivalent.

https://gist.github.com/mihaelamj/de29510a1444c3ab307a2cc7fd284c9f

Here's another ghist demonstration of how to adapt the codable model from a previous one, so that the comparison would evaluate to equivalent:

https://gist.github.com/mattpolzin/b8cf851cb2d61321909ce7d54d3f0a1e

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions