Skip to content

MSC3282: Expose enable_set_displayname in capabilities response #3282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

MSC3282: Expose enable_set_displayname in capabilities response #3282

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

@JonasKress
Copy link
Contributor

@JonasKress JonasKress mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2021
Closed
@JonasKress JonasKress added client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff proposal A matrix spec change proposal labels Jul 13, 2021
uhoreg
uhoreg reviewed Jul 13, 2021
View reviewed changes
proposals/3279-enable_set_displayname-capabilities.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# MSC3279: Expose enable_set_displayname in capabilities response
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But now this is MSC3282

@JonasKress JonasKress closed this Jul 13, 2021
@JonasKress JonasKress deleted the JonasKress/msc3279 branch July 13, 2021 17:33
@turt2live turt2live added the obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals label Jul 13, 2021
@turt2live turt2live changed the title MSC3279: Expose enable_set_displayname in capabilities response MSC3282: Expose enable_set_displayname in capabilities response Jul 13, 2021
bmarty
bmarty reviewed Jul 19, 2021
View reviewed changes
proposals/3282-enable_set_displayname-capabilities.md
```javascript
{
"capabilities": {
"m.enable_set_displayname": false,
Copy link

@bmarty bmarty Jul 19, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here, I think that can_set_displayname is a better name from a client point of view.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR is not up to date. The current PR is: #3283

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@uhoreg uhoreg uhoreg left review comments

@bmarty bmarty bmarty left review comments

+1 more reviewer

@dklimpel dklimpel dklimpel left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@JonasKress @uhoreg @bmarty @dklimpel @turt2live