&& is shorter then ||

[flancer64]

'&&' usage is shorter then '||', if first part of the equity is 'false' then all equity is 'false'

[GordonLesti]

Hello @flancer64
why is && shorter as ||? You have 5 lines instead of 3 or?

[flancer64]

@GordonLesti PHP should calculate all parts of the complex condition in case of "||" - whole condition will be 'true' if all parts are 'true'. In case of "&&" PHP should compute conditions up to the first 'false'. If first condition is 'true' and second condition is 'false' then equity is 'false' and all other conditions are not calculated at all. This is what I meant when I said "shorter".

   $isSuitableMethodType = (
        !$method->isStatic() &&
        !$method->isFinal() &&
        !$method->isConstructor() &&
        !$method->isDestructor()
    );

If $method->isFinal() returns 'true' then methods $method->isConstructor() and $method->isDestructor() will not be called.

[GordonLesti]

But I guess || is doing the same magic, just contrariwise. The expression

!($method->isConstructor() || $method->isFinal() || $method->isStatic() || $method->isDestructor())

gets false if the first condition $method->isConstructor() returns true.

[flancer64]

Yes, it is. You are right :)