Skip to content

Conversation

mashhurs
Copy link
Contributor

@mashhurs mashhurs commented Mar 20, 2025

Recently LS core upgraded elasticsearch-ruby client to v8. This plugin uses it in integration tests and recent failures show due to es-ruby client upgrade: https://github.com/logstash-plugins/logstash-output-elasticsearch/pull/1207/checks?check_run_id=39057545885

This change tolerates elasticsearch-ruby both v7 and v8 clients.

@mashhurs mashhurs requested a review from jsvd March 21, 2025 15:50
Copy link
Member

@jsvd jsvd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM assuming tests are all green

@mashhurs mashhurs merged commit d9dd45e into logstash-plugins:main Mar 21, 2025
3 checks passed
jsvd added a commit to jsvd/logstash-output-elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
…tash-plugins#1208)

* elasticsearch-ruby client got updated to v8 in LS core. This plugin uses it in integration tests. This change tolerates both elasticsearch-ruby v7 and v8 client versions.

* Fix the ILM spec issue where  method was removed, restored internally.

---------

Co-authored-by: João Duarte <[email protected]>
jsvd added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
…fixes) (#1219)

Adds two new headers to each bulk request:

* "X-Elastic-Event-Count": number of actions / documents in that bulk request
* "X-Elastic-Uncompressed-Request-Length": size in bytes of the request body before compression

X-Elastic-Uncompressed-Request-Length is equal to Content-Length when compression is disabled.

Backport fixes:

* Tolerate the elasticsearch-ruby v8 client in integration tests. (#1208)
* elasticsearch-ruby client got updated to v8 in LS core. This plugin uses it in integration tests. This change tolerates both elasticsearch-ruby v7 and v8 client versions.
* Fix the ILM spec issue where  method was removed, restored internally.

Co-authored-by: Mashhur <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants