Skip to content

[Clang][LLVM] Implement multi-single vectors MOP4{A/S} #129226

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

jthackray
Copy link
Contributor

Implement all multi-single {BF/F/S/U/SU/US}MOP4{A/S} instructions in clang and
llvm following the acle in https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/381/files.

This PR depends on #128854

@jthackray jthackray force-pushed the si_mu_vec branch 3 times, most recently from e3d0f18 to 03510f2 Compare March 28, 2025 20:27
Copy link
Contributor

@CarolineConcatto CarolineConcatto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you Jonathan

Implement all multi-single {BF/F/S/U/SU/US}MOP4{A/S} instructions in clang and
llvm following the acle in https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/381/files.
@jthackray jthackray merged commit 558ce50 into llvm:main Apr 1, 2025
11 checks passed
Ankur-0429 pushed a commit to Ankur-0429/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
Implement all multi-single {BF/F/S/U/SU/US}MOP4{A/S} instructions in clang and
llvm following the ACLE in https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/381/files
jthackray added a commit to jthackray/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
Fix some of the recently-added tests (PRs llvm#127797, llvm#128854, llvm#129226
and llvm#129230) which were incorrectly defined.
@jthackray jthackray deleted the si_mu_vec branch April 8, 2025 07:58
jthackray added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Fix some of the recently-added tests (PRs #127797, #128854, #129226 and
#129230) which were incorrectly defined.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants