[ExecutionEngine] reinstate necessary include for building with -DLLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS

[h-vetinari]

This is a build regression from 1f4d91e when using -DLLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS=ON (already commented by @Zentrik on the commit), as std::map is evidently used further down in that TU

llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/TargetProcess/JITLoaderVTune.cpp

Line 115 in c8cd497

using NativeCodeMap = std::map<uint64_t, SourceLocations>;

CC @kazutakahirata

[Zentrik]

Perhaps we should only include map if -DLLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS=ON like in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117926/files.

[h-vetinari]

Fine by me to put it behind the #if as well - I just put it where it had been pre-1f4d91e

[h-vetinari]

@kazutakahirata, since your commit broke compilation here, can you please let us know how you'd prefer to be fixed?

[kazutakahirata]

LGTM. Sorry for being late in getting back to this.

[h-vetinari]

Thanks for the review. Any thoughts on whether this should move behind the #if LLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS?

Also, as I don't have the commit rights, I cannot merge this myself - would appreciate if someone could push the button. :)

[h-vetinari]

Ping @kazutakahirata - given that this your cleanup (at least partially automated AFAIU?), it would be good to ensure that this doesn't happen again for the next clean-up. If moving this behind the respective #if would help, I'm happy to do it. If not, then the PR can IMO be merged as-is (I just don't have the rights to merge myself).

[h-vetinari]

Ping @kazutakahirata; please either merge this PR (I don't have the commit bit), or - preferably - respond to my question above.

[h-vetinari]

Ping @kazutakahirata

[h-vetinari]

Based on

llvm-project/llvm/Maintainers.md

Lines 353 to 356 in 03e7862

	#### MCJIT, Orc, RuntimeDyld, PerfJITEvents
	Lang Hames \
	[email protected] (email), [lhames](https://github.com/lhames) (GitHub)

perhaps @lhames can chime in here (or simply merge)? Not sure whose maintainership this falls under, but I'm not successful in getting a response here.

[kazutakahirata]

Ping @kazutakahirata - given that this your cleanup (at least partially automated AFAIU?), it would be good to ensure that this doesn't happen again for the next clean-up. If moving this behind the respective #if would help, I'm happy to do it. If not, then the PR can IMO be merged as-is (I just don't have the rights to merge myself).

Sorry again for being so late in getting back to you. Yes, moving the include behind #if LLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS sounds good. Let me create PR for that.

[kazutakahirata]

I've created #124083.

[h-vetinari]

Yes, moving the include behind #if LLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS sounds good.

It would have been a trivial update to this PR, but whatever gets this fixed. ;-)

[h-vetinari]

Obsoleted by #124083