-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
Description
| Bugzilla Link | 1107 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Nov 07, 2018 00:17 |
| Version | trunk |
| OS | All |
| Reporter | LLVM Bugzilla Contributor |
Extended Description
I have been trying to solve a little mystery. After resolving various issues
with the test case itsellf (MultisSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset), I
have determined that there is a codegen bug that this test triggers when
-instcombine is run. Here's how I know this:
-
If you run the Output/consumer-typeset.linked.rbc file through lli in JIT
mode it works fine. -
All three backends (llc,jit,cbe) fail in the same way. They all produce the
same incorrect output. This indicates a misoptimization rather than a code
gen bug. -
I used findmisopt to find the first optimization that caused the output to
differ. It reported this sequence of optimizations as the first set that
produces a difference in the output:
-lowersetjmp -funcresolve -raiseallocs -simplifycfg -mem2reg -globalopt
-globaldce -ipconstprop -deadargelim -instcombine -
bugpoint produces a non-sensical reduction (two branches and a return)
I'm wondernig if someone can bugpoint this on Darwin because I'm starting to
think that bugpoint doesn't work so well on Linux. In the last month, a Darwin
run of bugpoint was able to reduce a test case that a run on Linux, with the
same inputs, could not reduce. If you can reduce this on Darwin, I'll file a bug
against bugpoint.